The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that former President Trump is partially immune from prosecution, with absolute immunity for his core constitutional powers and a presumption of immunity for official acts. However, Trump lacks immunity for unofficial acts. The case has been sent back to the trial judge to determine which of Trump’s actions were part of his official duties and therefore protected from prosecution. This decision means that the case against Trump likely won’t be tried before the election, and could be further delayed if he is reelected.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court’s decision, joined by conservative justices. Dissenting were the three liberal justices. The decision sends the case back to trial Judge Tanya Chutkan, delaying any potential trial for months. Even after separating official acts from unofficial ones, Trump could seek further delays with appeals.
The decision came months after the court agreed to hear the case, sparking criticism for the delay in handling presidential power cases. In contrast, the court ruled swiftly against President Nixon in 1974. This ruling highlights the complexities of immunity questions and the potential impact on the timeline of legal proceedings. As the case further develops, it could have significant implications for Trump and his legal challenges.
Source
Photo credit alaskapublic.org