Gates Foundation’s Affectionate Ties with Modi Amid Controversy
In September 2019, Bill Gates honored Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi with an award from the Gates Foundation for his efforts in enhancing sanitation. This accolade sparked widespread criticism, particularly from three Nobel Peace Prize laureates, who questioned Modi’s dedication to human rights. They argued that granting him such recognition contradicted the foundation’s mission to alleviate inequity.
Despite the backlash, Gates and Modi have maintained a warm relationship, meeting frequently over the past decade. Gates’s forthcoming visit to India—a third in three years—aims to underscore the country’s innovative strides and foster goodwill with government officials. The Gates Foundation emphasizes India’s significance in its philanthropic endeavors, leveraging Modi’s government to address global developmental concerns amid decreased U.S. foreign aid.
For Modi, Gates’s endorsement serves as a valuable asset, aligning the global tech figure’s legacy with his administration’s digital economy policies. Their shared vision of harnessing technology for growth resonates strongly, as evidenced by Modi’s government promoting the Clean India Mission—a campaign Gates has previously lauded. Gates’s remarks during his meetings in India further illustrate his support for Modi’s initiatives, with technology and developmental goals at the forefront of their discussions.
The Gates Foundation has a substantial presence in India, prioritizing public health, education, and poverty eradication—areas where it has consistently found alignment with Modi’s objectives. Notably, its history of collaboration with previous Indian governments has consistently focused on health initiatives, though concerns persist within the foundation over the political implications of publicly praising Modi amidst his government’s controversial policies.
As Gates continues to navigate this intricate relationship, both leaders stand to gain from their mutual support, advancing their respective interests on both the domestic and global fronts.
Source
Photo credit www.nytimes.com
