In Cajolá, Guatemala, Israel Vail’s life revolves around the remittances sent by his three children working illegally in the U.S. These funds have enabled him to build a home and open a food shop, essential for his family’s survival. Many residents in migratory towns like Cajolá depend on such remittances for their livelihoods, which provide a crucial economic lifeline.
However, recent policy proposals by House Republicans and President Trump threaten to impose a 5% excise tax on remittance transfers and are exploring a presidential memorandum to “shut down” remittances from undocumented immigrants. This has drawn criticism, including from Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, who argues that such measures could harm economies in both nations and contradict the principles of economic freedom that the U.S. upholds. Experts contend that curbing remittances could lead to more illegal immigration, as financial support from the U.S. helps counter the motivations for many to migrate.
While proponents of controlling remittances argue it deters illegal immigration and could generate government revenue, critics warn of a potential economic downturn in communities reliant on this income. In the U.S., legislation aimed at taxing remittances has largely failed, with Oklahoma being the exception. Experts like Manuel Orozco emphasize that any reduction in remittances would adversely impact both the U.S. and home countries, likely leading to decreased savings and increased migration pressure. Local leaders in Cajolá express fear that diminished remittance flows could devastate their economy, leading to job losses and diminished opportunities. Vail noted that since Trump took office, his business has struggled, illustrating the direct impact of political decisions on livelihoods in reliant communities.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
