President Donald Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles amid protests over immigration policies raises questions about the military’s role in domestic unrest. While their current assignment focuses on protecting federal properties, California leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, oppose this action. Trump has yet to invoke the Insurrection Act, which would allow greater military involvement in law enforcement but is generally contentious. Legal expert Elizabeth Goiten warned that the memorandum authorizing military aid without specific reference to Los Angeles suggests a national reach, which could set a precedent for military policing of protests.
Ilan Wurman from the University of Minnesota Law School noted that Trump’s actions fall within existing legal precedents concerning military assistance in enforcing federal law, yet warned that invoking the Insurrection Act could lead to more significant legal issues. The Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts military involvement in law enforcement, has loopholes, including the Insurrection Act. The last significant invocation of this law was during the 1992 LA riots. In contrast, Trump is using other legal frameworks to justify current deployments, which have been challenged by California’s lawsuit citing state sovereignty.
The financial implications of this deployment could be substantial, potentially costing around $134 million. Military readiness for domestic protests is also questionable, heightening risks of escalation in confrontations with civilians. Insisting protesters are “insurrectionists,” Trump hasn’t ruled out the Insurrection Act but stated there is currently no pressing need for it. Legal experts note that any future invocation could prompt significant judicial scrutiny and constitutional debates.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
